WebHershovitz presents the chestnut Alcorn v. Mitchell,1 in which a wealthy person spat on the lower-class plaintiff in order to express his contempt for him. The jury found for the plaintiff in his battery claim – the spit being the battery – and awarded him $2,000 in vindictive ... Kresin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.5 – captures both the power ... WebMar 31, 2004 · Read People v. Johnson, 807 N.E.2d 693, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
Memorial on William DeWitt Mitchell - Minnesota Legal …
WebAlcorn v. Mitchell - 63 Ill. 553 (1872) Rule: It is customary to instruct juries that they may give vindictive damages where there are circumstances of malice, willfulness, wantonness, … WebFeb 20, 2024 · The imposition of tort liability is similar, but the message is somewhat different. Hershovitz presents the chestnut Alcorn v. Mitchell, 1 in which a wealthy person spat on the lower-class plaintiff in order to express his contempt for him. The jury found for the plaintiff in his battery claim – the spit being the battery – and awarded him ... targeted drug therapy for lung cancer
THIS WEEK IN TORTS
WebTaking the classic case of Alcorn v Mitchell as a template, this chapter argues that the primary reason for regarding tort as a substitute for revenge is that both are tools for doing corrective justice. WebWILLIAM E. ALCORN v. ANDREW J. MITCHELL. Supreme Court of Illinois. June Term, 1872. APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Marion county; the Hon. SILAS L. BRYAN, … WebIn 1872, the Supreme Court of Illinois decided a case called Alcorn v Mitchell. It was not the first litigation between the parties. Some years earlier, Alcorn had sued Mitchell for … targeted early numeracy ten